CRDO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fabrinet has a net margin of -5.87% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 9.62%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of -4.68% beat Fabrinet's return on equity of 18.42%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $78.08, signalling upside risk potential of 36.78%. On the other hand Fabrinet has an analysts' consensus of $266.56 which suggests that it could grow by 28.91%. Given that Credo Technology Group Holding has higher upside potential than Fabrinet, analysts believe Credo Technology Group Holding is more attractive than Fabrinet.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fabrinet has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.247%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fabrinet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fabrinet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $72M, which are smaller than Fabrinet quarterly revenues of $804.2M. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of -$4.2M is lower than Fabrinet's net income of $77.4M. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fabrinet's PE ratio is 24.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 39.24x versus 2.52x for Fabrinet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microchip Technology has a net margin of -5.87% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 6.74%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of -4.68% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of 11.71%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $78.08, signalling upside risk potential of 36.78%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $78.18 which suggests that it could grow by 38.92%. Given that Microchip Technology has higher upside potential than Credo Technology Group Holding, analysts believe Microchip Technology is more attractive than Credo Technology Group Holding.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.517, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.674%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out 47.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $72M, which are smaller than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of -$4.2M is lower than Microchip Technology's net income of $78.4M. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 39.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 39.24x versus 5.57x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of -5.87% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of -44.61%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of -4.68% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -10.25%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $78.08, signalling upside risk potential of 36.78%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $127.52 which suggests that it could grow by 22.76%. Given that Credo Technology Group Holding has higher upside potential than Marvell Technology, analysts believe Credo Technology Group Holding is more attractive than Marvell Technology.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.413, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.297%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -22.16% of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $72M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of -$4.2M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of -$676.3M. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 39.24x versus 16.72x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -5.87% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 55.04%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of -4.68% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $78.08, signalling upside risk potential of 36.78%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $174.02 which suggests that it could grow by 34.91%. Given that Credo Technology Group Holding has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Credo Technology Group Holding is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.285%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $72M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of -$4.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 50.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 39.24x versus 28.31x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.