CRDO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 21.52% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 33.09%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 8.81% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 18.85%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $84.09, signalling downside risk potential of -1.66%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $281.99 which suggests that it could grow by 12.8%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than Credo Technology Group Holding, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than Credo Technology Group Holding.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.036%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $170M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $15B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $36.6M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5B. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 316.70x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 93.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 34.08x versus 20.98x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 21.52% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of -6.48%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 8.81% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $84.09, signalling downside risk potential of -1.66%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.29 which suggests that it could grow by 1%. Given that Intel has higher upside potential than Credo Technology Group Holding, analysts believe Intel is more attractive than Credo Technology Group Holding.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.905%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $170M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $36.6M is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 316.70x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 34.08x versus 1.71x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 21.52% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 9.39%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 8.81% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $84.09, signalling downside risk potential of -1.66%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $89.24 which suggests that it could grow by 21.39%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Credo Technology Group Holding, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Credo Technology Group Holding.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.759, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.9%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $170M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $36.6M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 316.70x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 34.08x versus 9.82x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 21.52% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 42.61%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 8.81% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $84.09, signalling downside risk potential of -1.66%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.60 which suggests that it could grow by 19.99%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Credo Technology Group Holding, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Credo Technology Group Holding.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.079%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $170M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $36.6M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 316.70x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 46.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 34.08x versus 23.96x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.